People v. Hache

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Mexican officials did not have “specific intent to torture” the petitioner
• “‘[T]orture’ does not cover ‘negligent acts’ or harm stemming from a lack of resources.”
• “‘[T]orture’ does not cover ‘negligent acts’ or harm stemming from a lack of resources.”
• “Claims under the 2 [CAT] must be considered in terms of the aggregate risk of torture from all sources, 3 and not as separate, divisible, claims.” (quotation marks and ellipsis omitted)
• “Claims under the Convention Against Torture must be considered in terms of the aggregate risk of torture from all sources, and not as separate, divisible . . . claims.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).