People v. Guzman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The people are required to prove that there was a specific intent to steal, and the act must contemplate such a permanent appropriation of the property. A temporary taking will not establish the larcenous intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Ricchiuti
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-04-11· cited 28×
• People v. Dekle
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1981-07-16· cited 26×
• People v. Nixon
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1989-12-07· cited 18×
• People v. Parker
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-09-12· cited 15×
• OBEYA
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 2016-07-01· cited 6×
• People v. Hoyt
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-03-31· cited 3×
• People v. Brigante
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1992-10-01· cited 2×
• People v. Monahan
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1984-07-23· cited 1×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-03-03· cited 1×
• People v. Llera
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1991-10-24· cited 1×
• People v. Porter
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1993-01-12
• People v. Woodard
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-04-28

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Sandoval
  New York Court of Appeals· 1974-06-19· cited 2,008×
• People v. Duffy
  New York Court of Appeals· 1975-03-24· cited 199×
• People v. Greer
  New York Court of Appeals· 1977-07-07· cited 150×
• People v. Vidal
  New York Court of Appeals· 1970-03-05· cited 51×