Skip to main content

People v. Guerrero

Citations

  • 826 N.E.2d 485
  • 356 Ill. App. 3d 22
  • 292 Ill. Dec. 344
  • 2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “[t]he date of the offense is not an essential factor in child sex offense cases”
  • stating “[t]he date of the offense is not an essential factor in child sex offense cases”
  • considering children’s young age and the fact that the acts occurred over a three-year period, dates were as definite as possible
  • finding that the three-year period identified in the indictment as when the abuse occurred, beginning when the child was six years old, was “as definite as possible” given the victim’s young age and the fact that the abuse occurred over a three-year period
  • finding dates in indictment sufficient where the victims were first abused when they were about six years old and the indictments and bill of particulars indicated that they were abused over a three-year time period
  • “A prior prosecution can easily be proven by reference to the record, thereby protecting a defendant from being placed in double jeopardy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolfson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.