Appellate Court of Illinois· 2/8/1983

People v. Griffiths

Citations

445 N.E.2d 521
112 Ill. App. 3d 322
68 Ill. Dec. 73
1983 Ill. App. LEXIS 1445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

plain error exists only when the defendant’s substantial rights are affected or the evidence is closely balanced
plain error exists only when the defendant's substantial rights are affected or the evidence is closely balanced
plain error exists only when the defen dant's substantial rights are affected or the evidence is closely balanced
although a party who opens the door to testimony on a particular subject is precluded from objecting to evidence on the same subject, that rule does not extend to foreclose a party from objecting to evidence on grounds not violated by the party’s first admission of this evidence
although a party who opens the door to testimony on a particular subject is precluded from objecting to evidence on the same subject, that rule does not extend to foreclose a party from objecting to evidence on grounds not violated by the party's first admission of this evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trapp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Griffiths

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.