People v. Griffith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• on review, record examined to “determine whether the trial court had jurisdiction to enter a contempt order”
• defense counsel argued that the trial court “was not impartial and acted as a ‘functionary of the State, or a third prosecutor’ ”
• on review, record examined to \determine whether the trial court had jurisdiction to enter a contempt order\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Bell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-12-18· cited 23×
• In Re Marriage of Lichtenstein
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-07-22· cited 17×
• People v. Minor
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-06-03· cited 14×
• Petrakh v. Morano
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-09-16· cited 4×
• Houston v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of Clark
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2006-06-15· cited 4×
• Houston v. DIST. CT.
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2006-06-15

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Miller
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-03-21· cited 58×
• People v. Ernest
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-12-20· cited 38×
• People v. Tomashevsky
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1971-06-24· cited 31×
• People v. Murray
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-02-13· cited 30×
• People v. Hicks
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-05-15· cited 29×
• City of Chicago v. Hart Building Corp.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1969-10-21· cited 21×
• People v. Coulter
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-03-16· cited 15×
• People v. Bertelle
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-12-14· cited 12×
• People v. Simac
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-11-03· cited 8×
• People v. Griffith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-05-10· cited 2×