California Supreme Court· 10/19/1956
People v. Green
Citations
- 302 P.2d 307
- 47 Cal. 2d 209
- 1956 Cal. LEXIS 270
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding trial court had discretion to permit use of motion picture and photographs later admitted into evidence during opening statement
- allowing the use of photographs of the murder victim and the defendant in prison garb during opening statements because the display might aid the purpose of opening statements
- allowing the use of photographs of the murder victim and the defendant in prison garb during opening statements because the display might aid the purpose of opening statements
- upholding the use of photographs of the murder victim and the defendant in prison garb during opening statements, stating that it may aid the purpose of the opening statements
- upholding the use of photographs of the murder victim and the defendant in prison garb during opening statements, stating that it may aid the purpose of the opening statements
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schauer, Spence
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
78 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-04-24· cited 1,166×
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 1,077×
- People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court· 1964-01-07· cited 474×
- People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-12-31· cited 418×
- People v. HinesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 357×
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-11-19· cited 345×
- People v. FauberCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-06-18· cited 290×
- People v. WashCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-11-18· cited 245×
- People v. RamosCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-01-25· cited 237×
- In Re AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-11-18· cited 213×
- People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-07-09· cited 180×
- People v. KetchelCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-05-07· cited 160×
- People v. LuceroCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-03-28· cited 160×
- People v. CavittCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-06-21· cited 146×
- People v. ComptonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-11-16· cited 141×
- People v. LoveCalifornia Supreme Court· 1961-11-02· cited 139×
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1959-08-28· cited 136×
- People v. LindenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1959-04-22· cited 134×
- People v. PolkCalifornia Supreme Court· 1965-10-20· cited 133×
- People v. LoveCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-03-22· cited 131×
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Andres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-04-26· cited 356×
- People v. EggersCalifornia Supreme Court· 1947-10-03· cited 168×
- People v. HoytCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-04-30· cited 104×
- Winston v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1899-01-08· cited 92×
- People v. MortonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1953-09-25· cited 91×
- People v. ByrdCalifornia Supreme Court· 1954-02-04· cited 88×
- People v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court· 1939-02-27· cited 86×
- Ballew v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1895-12-16· cited 80×
- People v. LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1945-07-30· cited 80×
- People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court· 1939-10-05· cited 68×
- People v. BarclayCalifornia Supreme Court· 1953-01-09· cited 67×
- People v. WilkesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-06-10· cited 62×
- People v. OdleCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-04-27· cited 62×
- People v. WallerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1939-11-30· cited 59×
- People v. GosdenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1936-04-01· cited 58×
- People v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-08-03· cited 53×
- People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1945-09-25· cited 46×
- People v. LearyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-01-05· cited 45×
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court· 1940-07-16· cited 44×
- People v. CarnineCalifornia Supreme Court· 1953-08-14· cited 41×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.