Skip to main content

People v. Graves

Citations

  • 800 N.E.2d 790
  • 207 Ill. 2d 478
  • 279 Ill. Dec. 502

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “setting forth identical offenses is not synonymous with setting forth identical elements” (emphases in original)
  • comparing unauthorized theft of over $20,000 from a victim over 60 years of age to theft by deception of $20,000 from a victim over 60 years of age and concluding the offenses did not contain identical elements
  • referring to aggravated battery as “[a] textbook example of a single offense that can be committed in multiple ways,” yet distinguishing two subsections, referring to each as an “offense,” and observing they contain distinct “elements”
  • “setting forth identical offenses is not synonymous with setting forth identical elements[.] *** That a single offense of theft may be performed in an number of ways necessarily requires that the single offense of theft be defined in a number of ways.”
  • under identical elements test, court compared statutory elements of unauthorized theft to statutory elements of theft by deception
  • under the identical elements test, the proportionate penalties clause is violated where offenses with identical elements are given different sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.