People v. Glaser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “matters arising prior to pronouncement of judgment” must be reviewed during the time for appeal from the order granting probation and cannot be reviewed on a later appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Adoption of Alexander S.
  California Supreme Court· 1988-03-17· cited 96×
• People v. Newton
  California Court of Appeal· 1970-05-29· cited 89×
• People v. Norwood
  California Court of Appeal· 1972-06-19· cited 60×
• People v. Barnum
  California Supreme Court· 2003-03-17· cited 56×
• People v. Gonzales
  California Supreme Court· 1968-04-19· cited 42×
• People v. Thomas
  California Court of Appeal· 1974-12-13· cited 38×
• People v. Eberhardt
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-10-31· cited 34×
• People v. Harty
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-10-21· cited 32×
• People v. Robbins
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-03-04· cited 31×
• People v. Cervantes
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-12-14· cited 29×
• People v. Jones
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-01-15· cited 28×
• People v. Longwith
  California Court of Appeal· 1981-11-09· cited 26×
• People v. Barlow
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-03-14· cited 24×
• People v. Jackson
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-12-22· cited 23×
• People v. Vest
  California Court of Appeal· 1974-12-06· cited 22×
• People v. Solomos
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-08-17· cited 19×
• People v. Superior Court of Yolo County
  California Court of Appeal· 2017-04-13· cited 19×
• In Re Gerald B.
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-04-25· cited 16×
• People v. Munoz
  California Court of Appeal· 1975-09-22· cited 15×
• People v. Silva
  California Court of Appeal· 1966-03-23· cited 15×