Supreme Court of Colorado· 9/19/1977
People v. Gladney
Citations
- 570 P.2d 231
- 194 Colo. 68
- 1977 Colo. LEXIS 618
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that it is the “better practice” to provide a limiting instruction alongside res gestae evidence
- observing that defense counsel often chooses not to request a limiting instruction for strategic or tactical reasons, and therefore holding that a trial court’s failure to give such an instruction on its own motion is not reversible error
- concluding that the trial court had properly prevented questioning the witness because “[t]he defendant ma de no offer of proof to demonstrate that the [psychiatric] hospitalization was in any way relevant to the d efendant’s credibility three y ears later at the time of trial ”
- observing that defense counsel often chooses not to request a limiting instruction for strategic or tactical reasons, and therefore holding that a trial court's failure to give such an instruction on its own motion is not reversible error
- for strategic or tactical reasons, defense counsel may consider a limiting instruction more harmful than beneficial
- for strategic or tactical reasons, defense counsel may consider a limiting instruction more harmful than beneficial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carrigan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.