People v. Gilmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• State’s intent in its argument to the jury was immaterial; “what is material is the consequence of his action”
• State's intent in its argument to the jury was immaterial; \what is material is the consequence of his action\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Turner
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-01-05· cited 46×
• People v. Bracy
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-09-14· cited 19×
• People v. Bravos
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1969-09-09· cited 18×
• People v. Vinson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-07-05· cited 15×
• People v. Gnat
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-02-09· cited 9×
• People v. Gonzalez
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-06-08· cited 4×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-06-29· cited 3×
• People v. Seting
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-06-23· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mapp v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
• Fahy v. Connecticut
  Supreme Court· 1963-12-02· cited 1,743×
• People v. Castree
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1924-02-19· cited 87×
• The PEOPLE v. Bazemore
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1962-05-25· cited 63×
• People v. Hamby
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1955-09-23· cited 45×
• The People v. Realmo
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1963-09-27· cited 29×
• The PEOPLE v. Luna
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1967-05-18· cited 29×
• The PEOPLE v. Smith
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1968-11-22· cited 17×
• People v. Minor
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1966-05-13· cited 3×