Skip to main content

People v. Gill

Citations

  • 187 N.W.2d 707
  • 31 Mich. App. 395
  • 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 2097

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Since the arrest was constitutionally permissible the subsequent fingerprinting was valid. . . . Given a valid arrest and providing the police conduct does not ‘shock the conscience’ of the court, it is entirely proper to fingerprint the accused.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Gillis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.