People v. Giancoli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the criminal arrest history even of a juror’s family members “is a sufficiently race-neutral reason to satisfy the dictates of Batson”
• holding that the criminal arrest history even of a juror’s family members “is a sufficiently race-neutral reason to satisfy the dictates of Batson”
• holding that the criminal arrest history even of a juror’s family members “is a sufficiently race-neutral reason to satisfy the dictates of Batson’
• “Our precedent shows that the criminal arrest history of a prospective juror’s family members is a sufficiently race-neutral reason to satisfy the dictates of Batson.”
• “Our precedent shows that the criminal arrest history of a prospective juror’s family members is a sufficiently race-neutral reason to satisfy the dictates of Batson.”
• “[I]n exercising a peremptory strike, the prosecution ‘may rely on information and advice provided by others so long as this input is not predicated upon the race of the prospective juror.’ ” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).