Skip to main content
· 6/22/2016

People v. Gerathy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding \[d]ismissal of [plaintiff's] 6 mail fraud claim was proper because the mail fraud statute does not provide a private 7 right of action\
  • affirming dismissal of mail fraud claim “because the mail fraud statute does not 18 provide a private right of action”
  • “Dismissal of [pro se plaintiff’s] mail fraud claim was proper because the mail fraud 10 statute does not provide a private right of action.” (citing 18 U.S.C. § 1341)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.