Illinois Supreme Court· 11/21/1990

People v. Garrett

Citations

564 N.E.2d 784
139 Ill. 2d 189
151 Ill. Dec. 329
1990 Ill. LEXIS 119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[W]e accept the following count as accurate: Of the six prospective jurors challenged by the State, five were black (83%)
number of black members of venire peremptorily challenged, without more, is insufficient to establish prima facie case of discrimination
prosecutor gave a partial explanation for the use of peremptories and started to explain further but was cut off by the trial judge
prosecutor gave a partial explanation for the use of peremptories and started to explain further but was cut off by the trial judge
“The appellate court is empowered under Rule 615(b) to remand a cause for a hearing on a particular matter while retaining jurisdiction.”
“The appellate court is empowered under Rule 615(b) to remand a cause for a hearing on a particular matter while retaining jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stamos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

60 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.