People v. Gardenhire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a]bsent any evidence of prejudice based on the public defender’s replacement with another public defender,” there is “no reversible error in the trial court’s ruling”
• trial court’s decision not to poll jurors individually was not abuse of its discretion where media reports in question were not inherently prejudicial
• no abuse of discretion where media report did not concern the defendant's case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).