People v. Galindes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, prior to current Service of Documents Act, that process personally served by Swedish notary public need not be translated into Swedish
• “We hold that Sweden plainly contemplated service pursuant to the methods referred to in article 10 (b) and (c)[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).