People v. Fulmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well-settled that if a sentence is imposed within the statutory limits, and if it does not shock the conscience of the Court, it will not be disturbed by a reviewing court on the grounds that it constitutes cruel and unusual punishment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Close v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2002-05-28· cited 1,325×
• People v. Larson
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1977-12-12· cited 55×
• People v. Thomas
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1975-11-17· cited 41×
• People v. Bergstrom
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1975-12-22· cited 26×
• People v. Carter
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1974-11-04· cited 14×
• People v. Morgan
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1975-08-18· cited 11×
• People v. Simms
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1974-11-18· cited 10×
• People v. Hinchman
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1978-02-06· cited 9×
• People v. McKnight
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1979-01-08· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Herrera
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1973-10-29· cited 62×
• Austin v. City and County of Denver
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1970-01-13· cited 37×
• Raullerson v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1965-07-06· cited 23×
• Normand v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1968-05-06· cited 17×
• Trujillo v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1972-04-17· cited 11×
• People v. Rupert
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1974-07-01· cited 7×

Other cases named People v. Fulmer

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• People v. Fulmer
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2011-09-30· cited 7×
• People v. Fulmer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2013-02-25