People v. Freeman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the compulsory joinder rule is designed to prevent the state from bringing successive prosecutions for the same criminal conduct
• the compulsory joinder rule is designed to prevent the state from bringing successive prosecutions for the same criminal conduct
• Crim.P. 8(a) proscription against “subsequent prosecution” does not apply to charge dismissed prior to trial since jeopardy has not attached

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jeffrey v. District Court In & For the Eighth Judicial District
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1981-03-23· cited 78×
• Elk River Associates v. Huskin
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1984-06-14· cited 69×
• Hollis v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1981-04-20· cited 22×
• People v. Rogers
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1987-09-14· cited 21×
• Ruth v. COUNTY COURT IN & FOR CTY. OF EL PASO
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1979-05-29· cited 14×
• Chatfield v. Colorado Court of Appeals
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1989-06-19· cited 12×
• In Re the Marriage of Erickson
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1979-11-01· cited 8×
• People v. DIST. CT., CITY & CTY. OF DENVER
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1991-04-08· cited 5×
• People ex rel. Gallagher v. Arapahoe County Court
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1989-02-02· cited 2×
• People v. District Court, City & County of Denver
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1991-04-08· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Benton v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
• People v. Cooke
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1974-08-06· cited 50×
• People v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF ADAMS
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1973-10-23· cited 12×