People v. Freedman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “While voluntary intoxication affords no excuse for crime, an offense which is by law made to depend upon the state or condition of the mind of the accused cannot be committed by one who is incapable of forming the specific intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named People v. Freedman

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• People v. Freedman
  California Court of Appeal· 1952-06-13· cited 13×
• People v. Freedman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-04-27· cited 10×
• People v. Freedman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1926-03-15
• People v. Freedman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1928-03-15
• People v. Freedman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1972-12-26
• People v. Freedman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-01-21
• People v. Freedman
  City of New York Municipal Court· 1976-07-15
• People v. Freedman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1932-02-23