People v. Frarey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that challenge to long-expired COVID-19 restrictions was moot
• noting that application of the voluntary-cessation exception \turns on the circumstances of the particular case\ (emphasis added)
• suggesting that events showed that the Governor changed COVID-19 restrictions not to game the judicial system \but in response to the progress made in battling the pandemic\
• rejecting application of voluntary cessation doctrine where governor had not reimposed challenged restrictions “despite upticks in COVID-19 cases after he jettisoned” the challenged order
• rejecting application of voluntary cessation doctrine where governor had not reimposed challenged restrictions “despite upticks in COVID-19 cases after he jettisoned” the challenged order
• noting that this constituted a “night-and-day difference[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).