People v. Forest

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that newly discovered evidence does not justify coram nobis relief \unless it is of such character as will completely undermine the entire structure of the case upon which the prosecution was based\ (quotation and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• In Re Clark
  California Supreme Court· 1993-07-29· cited 661×
• People v. Gonzalez
  California Supreme Court· 1990-12-03· cited 513×
• People v. Superior Court (Zamudio)
  California Supreme Court· 2000-07-12· cited 322×
• In Re Steele
  California Supreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 204×
• People v. Shipman
  California Supreme Court· 1965-01-15· cited 193×
• In Re Lindley
  California Supreme Court· 1947-02-18· cited 158×
• People v. Hyung Joon Kim
  California Supreme Court· 2009-03-16· cited 151×
• People v. Tuthill
  California Supreme Court· 1948-10-19· cited 93×
• In Re Lucas
  California Supreme Court· 2004-07-26· cited 70×
• Ryan v. Rosenfeld
  California Supreme Court· 2017-06-15· cited 69×
• People v. Adair
  California Supreme Court· 2003-01-30· cited 62×
• In Re Smith
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-12-15· cited 60×
• Gas v. City & County of San Francisco
  California Court of Appeal· 2012-05-31· cited 36×
• Krug v. Maschmeier
  California Court of Appeal· 2009-03-25· cited 35×
• People v. Esmaili
  California Court of Appeal· 2013-02-27· cited 34×
• In Re De La Roi
  California Supreme Court· 1946-05-24· cited 33×
• People v. Welch
  California Supreme Court· 1964-08-31· cited 29×
• In Re Zepeda
  California Court of Appeal· 2006-08-14· cited 28×
• People v. Fowler
  California Court of Appeal· 1959-12-04· cited 27×
• Utility Reform Network v. Public Utilities Commission
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-02-05· cited 24×