California Supreme Court· 7/25/1966
People v. Ford
Citations
- 65 Cal. 2d 41
- 416 P.2d 132
- 52 Cal. Rptr. 228
- 1966 Cal. LEXIS 178
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the doctrine of res judicata justifies instructions, where relevant, that a defendant has been found guilty of crimes finally adjudicated which are charged as elements in another charge or charges then in the process of being retried”
- Penal Code § 1181, subd. 6, gives the court specific powers to reduce degree of crime
- a prior conviction for numerous felonies is res judicata and conclusive proof of the predicate felony for felony murder
- a prior conviction for numerous felonies is res judicata and conclusive proof of the predicate felony for felony murder
- discuss- ing 1990 addition of kidnapping to California Penal Code sec- tion 189
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peters, McComb
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-10-27· cited 855×
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-12-23· cited 762×
- Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-04-18· cited 422×
- People v. FieldsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1983-12-29· cited 392×
- People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-01-29· cited 330×
- United States v. Archie W. BrawnerD.C. Circuit· 1972-08-21· cited 318×
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1989-03-02· cited 291×
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-04-08· cited 287×
- People v. StankewitzCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-07-05· cited 282×
- People v. GillisMichigan Supreme Court· 2006-04-05· cited 274×
- People v. MosherCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-12-12· cited 265×
- People v. BassettCalifornia Supreme Court· 1968-08-08· cited 233×
- Richard Adams Hovey v. Robert L. Ayers, Jr., Acting Warden, California State Prison at San QuentinNinth Circuit· 2006-08-11· cited 223×
- People v. BigelowCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-12-27· cited 216×
- People v. RayfordCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-12-19· cited 215×
- People v. MansonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1976-08-13· cited 206×
- State v. ByrdSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1980-06-23· cited 191×
- People v. SatchellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-11-04· cited 171×
- People v. DrewCalifornia Supreme Court· 1978-09-26· cited 168×
- People v. SirhanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-06-16· cited 166×
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-12-13· cited 950×
- Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1948-01-12· cited 555×
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1950-04-21· cited 425×
- People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1949-01-25· cited 362×
- People v. WashingtonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1965-05-25· cited 351×
- People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-11-19· cited 345×
- Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court· 1962-10-25· cited 334×
- People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court· 1964-02-04· cited 317×
- People v. ConleyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-03-15· cited 312×
- People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1958-05-27· cited 311×
- People v. GorshenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1959-03-11· cited 273×
- People v. RobillardCalifornia Supreme Court· 1960-12-29· cited 215×
- People v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court· 1964-08-31· cited 209×
- People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court· 1944-10-31· cited 190×
- People v. KetchelCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-05-07· cited 160×
- People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1954-03-26· cited 140×
- In Re ChapmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1954-09-08· cited 121×
- People v. TubbyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1949-06-15· cited 119×
- People v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court· 1964-11-25· cited 109×
- People v. LoganCalifornia Supreme Court· 1953-07-14· cited 106×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.