People v. Fonerin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Kaufman involved “different circumstances,” namely, “[t]he taxpayers’ continued reliance on the initial appraisal in the face of [Bahar]’s comments”
• affording little weight to two of the appraiser’s comparables where sale price adjustments “ranged from 11.2% to 20.3% and included significant adjustments based on [the appraiser’s] subjective evaluation of the properties’ ‘condition’”
• “We recognize technical differences between the easements and local law, but we agree with respondent’s conclusion that the restrictions were practically the same”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).