People v. Folenga

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the circuit court did not err in setting trial date outside 120-day period because “both of the [State’s] witnesses, whose unavailability necessitated delaying the trial, were out-of-State witnesses who could not be subpoenaed by the usual process”
• finding that the circuit court did not err in setting trial date outside 120-day period because “both of the [State’s] witnesses, whose unavailability necessitated delaying the trial, were out-of-State witnesses who could not be subpoenaed by the usual process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).