People v. Floyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• state-of-mind exception to hearsay rule applies only where declarant’s state of mind is relevant to a material issue in the case
• state-of-mind exception to hearsay rule applies only where declarant’s state of mind is relevant to a material issue in the case
• state-of-mind exception to hearsay rule applies only where declarant's state of mind is relevant to a material issue in the case
• state-of-mind exception to hearsay rule applies only where declarant's state of mind is relevant to a material issue in the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Floyd
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1984-10-19· cited 55×
• People v. Clifton
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-04-24· cited 39×
• People v. Floyd
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-09-02· cited 10×
• People v. Clifton
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-08-04· cited 6×
• People v. Clifton Supplemental Opinion on Rehearing
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-04-24
• People v. Clifton Modified Pursuant to Supervisory Order
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-08-03

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Roland W. Brown
  D.C. Circuit· 1974-01-10· cited 216×
• People v. Oliver
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-06-21· cited 33×
• People v. Lang
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-05-17· cited 29×
• People v. Goodman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-10-16· cited 20×
• People v. Patterson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-12-16· cited 18×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-03-18· cited 4×
• People v. Cartwright
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-11-06· cited 1×