People v. Flores

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying particularly vulnerable victim aggravator because of the victim’s young age was inappropriate because all victims of the crime of oral copulation with an individual under 16 are young

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Butler v. Curry
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-06-09· cited 174×
• People v. Dancer
  California Court of Appeal· 1996-05-31· cited 56×
• People v. Garcia
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-04-16· cited 31×
• People v. Quinones
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-07-18· cited 27×
• People v. Ginese
  California Court of Appeal· 1981-07-10· cited 24×
• People v. Reynolds
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-04-20· cited 23×
• People v. Webber
  California Court of Appeal· 1991-03-26· cited 21×
• People v. La Fargue
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-10-07· cited 17×
• People v. Estrada
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-01-06· cited 17×
• People v. Lutes
  California Court of Appeal· 1981-04-09· cited 16×
• People v. Garcia
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-10-13· cited 10×
• People v. Parrott
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-04-15· cited 10×
• People v. Diaz
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-04-25· cited 3×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Robinson v. California
  Supreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 2,369×
• People v. Harvey
  California Supreme Court· 1979-11-27· cited 966×
• People v. Warner
  California Supreme Court· 1978-03-01· cited 104×
• People v. Henderson
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-06-25· cited 47×
• People v. Martin
  California Court of Appeal· 1980-06-27· cited 41×
• People v. Simpson
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-03-23· cited 33×
• People v. Cheatham
  California Supreme Court· 1979-03-26· cited 32×