Illinois Supreme Court· 5/30/1991

People v. Fiorini

Citations

574 N.E.2d 612
143 Ill. 2d 318
158 Ill. Dec. 499
1991 Ill. LEXIS 39

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

acknowledging general rule that amendment will be construed as prospective, absent express language to the contrary
acknowledging general rule that amendment will be construed as prospective, absent express language to the contrary
acknowledging general rule that amendment will be construed as prospective, absent express language to the contrary
“A counterclaim, is an action brought by a named party against another existing party to the [original] action”
the appellees, i.e., the prevailing parties in the trial court, forfeited the defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies because they never raised that defense in the trial court
upheld third party complaint against third party defendant who allegedly violated state pollution laws

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Freeman, Heiple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Fiorini

5 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.