People v. Fields

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[in Yates], that [c]ourt held the imposition of [eleven] consecutive findings of contempt of a party for refusing to answer questions as to whether [eleven] different people were members of the Communist [p]arty deprived him of due process”
• \[the][c]ourt [in Yates ] held [that] the imposition of [eleven] consecutive findings of contempt of a party for refusing to answer questions as to whether [eleven] different people were members of the Communist [p]arty deprived [her] of due process\
• “[the] [c]ourt [in Yates] held [that] the imposition of [eleven] consecutive findings of contempt of a party for refusing to answer questions as to whether [eleven] different people were members of the Communist [p]arty deprived [her] of due process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rowe v. Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-12-09· cited 32×
• People v. Geiger
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-11-10· cited 4×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bloom v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 1,167×
• Taylor v. Hayes
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 663×
• People v. McDonald
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1975-11-25· cited 321×
• Yates v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1957-11-25· cited 222×
• The People v. Wilson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1967-09-29· cited 64×
• People Ex Rel. Cruz v. Fitzgerald
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-05-20· cited 39×
• The PEOPLE v. Bloom
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1966-09-23· cited 18×
• People v. Goodwin
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-10-09· cited 8×
• Illinois Commerce Commission v. Salamie
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-10-20· cited 5×
• United States v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
  Supreme Court· 1967-04-17· cited 5×