Supreme Court of Colorado· 1/29/1990
People v. Fields
Citations
- 785 P.2d 611
- 14 Brief Times Rptr. 135
- 1990 Colo. LEXIS 76
- 1990 WL 5453
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- inaccurate warrant report in the NCIC was insufficient only because no warrant had actually been issued
- arrest pursuant to incorrect computer information invalid
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rovira, Vollack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. BlehmSupreme Court of Colorado· 1999-06-28· cited 82×
- State v. EvansArizona Supreme Court· 1994-01-13· cited 21×
- People v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Colorado· 1990-07-09· cited 20×
- People v. ReynoldsColorado Court of Appeals· 1995-04-06· cited 14×
- State v. LanoueSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-01-25· cited 10×
- State v. MooreNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1992-10-30· cited 10×
- People v. GrassiColorado Court of Appeals· 2011-10-13· cited 7×
- People v. DiazColorado Court of Appeals· 1993-10-07· cited 2×
- People v. WoodsColorado Court of Appeals· 1994-05-19· cited 2×
- Ernest Perez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-12-09
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Whiteley v. Warden, Wyoming State PenitentiarySupreme Court· 1971-03-29· cited 1,845×
- Massachusetts v. SheppardSupreme Court· 1984-07-05· cited 854×
- People v. FreemanSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-09-06· cited 102×
- People v. BacaSupreme Court of Colorado· 1979-10-09· cited 23×
- People v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado· 1984-03-05· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.