People v. Ferguson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “If a person has parted with consideration entitling him to receive a thing of value, then he need not have obtained actual physical custody or delivery of the thing of value in order to have a proprietary interest in it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Schlicht
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1985-09-05· cited 4×
• People v. Rotello
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1988-05-23· cited 2×
• People v. Fullop
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1992-02-13· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Gonzales
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1983-06-27· cited 138×
• People v. Freeman
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1983-09-06· cited 102×
• People v. McCain
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1976-07-06· cited 11×
• People v. Gresham
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1981-12-24· cited 10×
• Martinez v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1972-02-22· cited 9×
• Midland Bean Company v. Farmers State Bank
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1976-05-06· cited 7×
• People v. Jones
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1984-10-18· cited 4×