People v. Fate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that the statute \creates an absolute bar to driving after ingesting a controlled substance * * * without regard to physical impairment\
• ruling that the statute “creates an absolute bar to driving after ingesting a controlled substance *** without regard to physical impairment”
• ruling that the statute “creates an absolute bar against driving a motor vehicle following the illegal ingestion of any cannabis or controlled substance” “without regard to physical impairment”
• holding that the “absolute bar against driving a motor vehicle following the illegal ingestion of any cannabis” was “a reasonable exercise of the police power of the State in the interest of safe streets and highways”
• concluding a flat ban prohibiting “any amount of a controlled substance” was constitutional given that there was no standard for impairment
• concluding a flat ban prohibiting “any amount of a controlled substance” was constitutional given that there was no standard for impairment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).