Skip to main content

People v. Fanning

Citations

  • 265 Cal. App. 2d 729
  • 71 Cal. Rptr. 641
  • 1968 Cal. App. LEXIS 1673

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • omission “obviously harmless . .. [since] [o]nce the jury had no reasonable doubt that [the defendant] was in the store and that he was aiding and abetting the robbery, it is inconceivable that it could have failed to find the necessary intent, even had it been correctly instructed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kaus, Moor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Fanning

12 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.