People v. Falls

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a general statute should not be interpreted as repealing a specific statute \[albsent clear and unmistakable legislative intent to the contrary\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Carrasco
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2003-08-28· cited 687×
• People v. Houser
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2013-01-31· cited 220×
• Jenkins v. Panama Canal Railway Co.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2009-05-18· cited 39×
• People v. Denton
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2003-09-18· cited 13×
• Gessler v. Doty
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2012-01-05· cited 7×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Martin v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2001-06-25· cited 325×
• People v. Terry
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1990-05-14· cited 169×
• Uberoi v. University of Colorado
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1984-08-27· cited 28×
• Mulkey v. Sullivan
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1988-04-18· cited 19×
• People v. Marquez
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1999-04-01· cited 5×