People v. Fabris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, although arson is not a “specific intent” offense, 3 conviction nevertheless “requires an intent to burn a structure when the burning is caused by the act of setting fire to a substance which is not itself the subject of the arson statute”
• explaining that, although arson is not a \specific intent\ offense, 3 conviction nevertheless \requires an intent to burn a structure when the burning is caused by the act of setting fire to a substance which is not itself the subject of the arson statute\
• \[A]rson can be categorized as a general intent crime.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).