People v. Evers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Sixth Amendment does not bar postindictment questioning in the absence of counsel if a defendant waives the right to counsel
• holding that Miranda warnings sufficiently informed a defendant who waived his right to counsel during police questioning. Id. at 292
• holding that a defendant who had been given Miranda warnings but spoke to police anyway waived his Sixth Amendment right to counsel
• holding that Miranda warnings sufficiently informed a defendant who .waived his right to counsel during police questioning. Id. at 292, 108 S.Ct. 2389
• holding that an accused advised of his Miranda rights “has been sufficiently apprised of the nature of his Sixth Amendment rights”
• holding that a valid Miranda waiver is sufficient to waive the Sixth Amendment right to counsel in the context of postindictment custodial interrogation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).