People v. Eury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the Civil Service Commission’s sharing of plaintiff’s stigmatizing label with federal agencies on a need to know basis was sufficiently public
• finding the “plus” prong satisfied when the plaintiff was “totally debarred from all federal employment for up to three years.”
• finding a plausible liberty interest where an employee had been rated “ineligible for employment because of unsatisfactory employment record,” which formally barred him from federal employment in any capacity for up to three years
• “In effect, Larry has been stigmatized throughout the entire federal government. He is deprived of the opportunity to work in any capacity for any branch of the government”
• Fifth Amendment claim in federal employment setting

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).