California Court of Appeal· 9/15/1983
People v. Estes
Citations
- 147 Cal. App. 3d 23
- 194 Cal. Rptr. 909
- 1983 Cal. App. LEXIS 2160
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that a use of force to prevent a store security guard from reclaiming the stolen property was sufficient to support a robbery conviction
- defendant used force to prevent a security guard from retaking property stolen from a department store
- defendant used force to prevent a security guard from retaking property stolen from a department store
- department store security guard was a robbery victim where, as agent of the owner of the goods stolen, he was person directly responsible for the security of the items
- extending definition of robbery by judicial interpretation
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Low
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2011-08-22· cited 543×
- People v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court· 1991-06-27· cited 289×
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2011-06-02· cited 281×
- The People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court· 2013-08-26· cited 147×
- Ball v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-09-10· cited 121×
- People v. DeFranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-10-09· cited 103×
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court· 2009-02-19· cited 76×
- People v. IrvinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-05-16· cited 74×
- People v. NguyenCalifornia Supreme Court· 2001-01-17· cited 68×
- People v. RandolphMichigan Supreme Court· 2002-07-11· cited 66×
- People v. CarrascoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-03-23· cited 62×
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-06-20· cited 50×
- People v. RushCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-05-27· cited 50×
- People v. HodgesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-01-31· cited 48×
- People v. PerryCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-09-11· cited 47×
- People v. FlynnCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-01-19· cited 47×
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-08-31· cited 47×
- People v. Van PhamCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1993-04-23· cited 47×
- People v. GuzmanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-05-22· cited 37×
- People v. BekeleCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-04-07· cited 30×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1977-01-20· cited 262×
- People v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-12-11· cited 231×
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-05-24· cited 198×
- People v. MoranCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-01-27· cited 171×
- People v. LaursenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-10-20· cited 154×
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-03-20· cited 86×
- People v. GuerinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-01-10· cited 35×
- People v. KentCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1981-11-03· cited 34×
- People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-10-13· cited 32×
- People v. DownsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-12-16· cited 29×
- People v. CovingtonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1934-07-18· cited 29×
- People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1970-02-20· cited 25×
- People v. SuttonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1973-11-12· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.