People v. Estes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• counseling expenses for victim's immediate family members who sustained psychological trauma as a result of defendant's eriminal conduct were compensable as restitution
• although amount of auto loan might have been owed by defendant to victim, it was improper to include that amount in restitution order where there was no evidence that loan was the result of criminal activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Pagan
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2006-09-21· cited 34×
• People v. Shepard
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1999-03-04· cited 23×
• People v. Brigner
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1999-04-01· cited 10×
• People v. Cardenas
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2011-01-20· cited 9×
• People v. Lunsford
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2001-05-10· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Quinonez
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1987-04-06· cited 41×
• Whimbush v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1994-02-14· cited 31×
• People v. Borquez
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1991-07-09· cited 27×
• People v. Phillips
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1986-08-21· cited 17×
• People v. Sandreschi
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1992-11-05· cited 9×
• People v. Dillingham
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-05-05· cited 9×