People v. Esquivel-Alaniz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[C]omment on the lack of evidence confirming a defendant’s theory of the case is permissible . . . .”
• “[C]omment on the lack of evidence confirming a defendant’s theory of the case is permissible . . . .”
• “[C]omment on the lack of evidence confirming a defendant’s theory of the case is permissible and does not shift the burden of proof.”
• “In the absence of particularized facts supporting [the] defendant’s assertion of ineffective assistance, the trial court was not required to hold a hearing on his motion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).