Skip to main content
· 7/22/1993

People v. Esqueda

Citations

  • 17 Cal. App. 4th 1450
  • 22 Cal. Rptr. 2d 126
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 10749
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6268
  • 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • among other improper tactics, police “clearly suggested . . . [defendant] would avoid the more serious charge by [making an] admission”; People v. Freeman, 668 P.2d 1371, 1379 (Colo. 1983
  • “As noted in the Legislative comment to the section, ‘Personal 18 delivery must be attempted in all cases where this alternative method of service is used.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.