People v. Ervin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the defendant cited \no authority for the proposition that a delay that may affect one's ability to serve sentences concurrently ... implicates due process\
• finding “no authority for the proposition that a delay that may affect one’s ability to serve sentences concurrently . . . implicates due process”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• People v. Laws
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1996-10-15· cited 39×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Parshay
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1981-03-05· cited 28×
• People v. Bisard
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1982-04-06· cited 26×
• People v. Gleason
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1984-09-21· cited 12×
• People v. Nuss
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1979-02-05· cited 11×