People v. Eric H.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying “public interest” mootness exception in consolidated mental health appeals and finding that the fact that the trial court repeated the same course in successive petitions suggested “the likelihood of a recurrence”
• applying “public interest” mootness exception in consolidated mental health appeals and finding that the fact that the trial court repeated the same course in successive petitions suggested “the likelihood of a recurrence”
• discussing the \plain language\ of the notice requirement in section 2-107.1 and holding that the failure to comply with the notice requirements invalidates a petition to involuntarily administer psychotropic medication; In re Carmody, 274 Ill. App. 3d 46, 53-54 (1995) (same)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).