People v. Englebrecht

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “any liberalization of the injunction to try to allow greater familial contact in the target area would limit the effectiveness of the injunction”
• holding that “any liberalization of the injunction to try to allow greater familial contact in the target area would limit the effectiveness of the injunction”
• holding that injunction prohibiting \Posole” gang signs and clothing is content-neutral; \[i]t is not the content of these expressions to which the injunction looks but the fact of them and their effect on others.”
• holding that A any liberalization of the injunction to try to allow greater familial contact in the target area would limit the effectiveness of the injunction @
• holding that injunction prohibiting “Posole” gang signs and clothing is content-neutral; “[i]t is not the content of these expressions to which the injunction looks but the fact of them and their effect on others.”
• holding that injunction prohibiting \Posole\ gang signs and clothing is content-neutral; \[i]t is not the content of these expressions to which the injunction looks but the fact of them and their effect on others.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).