Appellate Court of Illinois· 2/28/1992

People v. Engelbrecht

Citations

588 N.E.2d 452
225 Ill. App. 3d 550
167 Ill. Dec. 811
1992 Ill. App. LEXIS 297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

defendant, a nonfirst offender, was incorrectly warned that suspension period for refusing test was one year; defendant refused test and received two-year suspension
defendant, a nonfirst offender, was incorrectly warned that suspension period for refusing test was one year; defendant refused test and received two-year suspension
“The purpose of requiring that the motorist be warned of the consequences of his refusal is to enable him to make an informed choice”
“The purpose of requiring that the motorist be warned of the consequences of his refusal is to enable him to make an informed choice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woodward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.