People v. Enerson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[i]t is not necessary that the victim expressly testify that he was in apprehension of a battery to sustain a conviction [for criminal assault]; rather, it can be shown inferentially based on the conduct of the defendant and the victim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. VanHoose
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-07-23· cited 18×
• People v. VanHoose
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-12-30· cited 1×
• People v. Nakajima
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-02-19

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Collins
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1985-02-22· cited 2,507×
• People v. C.L.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-02-22· cited 23×
• In Re CL
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-02-22· cited 15×
• People v. Chrisopulos
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-03-28· cited 12×
• People v. Hasty
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1970-07-21· cited 7×
• People v. P.S.B.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-08-31· cited 6×