People v. Elwood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that no justifiable expectation of privacy existed in defendant’s statements made to himself in police interview room that were recorded by police
• noting that State did not introduce any evidence regarding the purpose behind monitoring defendant's statements spoken in an interview in answer to defendant's contention that his statements were protected unless monitored for institutional security purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).