People v. Elcock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reaffirming its holding in Evangelista and observing that the statutory scheme “requires all convicted defendants to contribute to the fund”
• Second District: \We note that the arrestee's medical costs fee is not covered by presentencing custody credit\
• Second District: “We note that the arrestee’s medical costs fee is not covered by presentencing custody credit”
• Second District: \We note that the arrestee’s medical costs fee is not covered by presentencing custody credit\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).