People v. Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• privilege not attaching to statements made for purpose of seeking secular counseling rather than for absolution
• privilege not attaching to statements made for purpose of seeking secular counseling rather than for absolution
• clergy member statute requires communications be intended to be in confidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-07-25· cited 27×
• Doe 2 v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-09-29· cited 17×
• State v. Martin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1998-07-17· cited 15×
• ROMAN CATH. ARCHBISHOP OF LA v. Super. Ct.
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-07-25· cited 15×
• Nicholson v. Wittig
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1992-06-04· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Stewart
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-08-02· cited 9×
• State v. Gray
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2004-04-28· cited 1×
• Nicholson v. Wittig
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1992-06-04

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Trammel v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1980-02-27· cited 1,217×
• People v. Ratliff
  California Supreme Court· 1986-04-03· cited 118×
• People v. Johnson
  California Court of Appeal· 1969-02-26· cited 13×
• People v. E.L.B.
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-09-26· cited 12×
• People v. Thompson
  California Court of Appeal· 1982-07-01· cited 3×