Appellate Court of Illinois· 10/31/2000
People v. Edgecombe
Citations
- 739 N.E.2d 914
- 250 Ill. Dec. 917
- 317 Ill. App. 3d 615
- 2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 847
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating the prosecutor’s repeated remarks that “no one,” other than the victim, testified at trial were designed to focus the jury’s attention on the defendant’s failure to testify
- “[t]he State may not use the limited investigatory procedure exception to place into evidence the substance of any out-of-court statement”
- under the course-of-investigation exception to the hearsay rule, an officer may not testify to information beyond what is necessary to explain his or her actions
- State’s comment on the defense’s failure to ask a witness the correct questions shifted the burden of proof to the defendant
- under the course-of-investigation exception to the hearsay rule, an officer may not testify to information beyond what is necessary to explain his or her actions
- “[t]he State may not use the limited investigatory procedure exception to place into evidence the substance of any out-of-court statement”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McBRIDE
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.