People v. Echavarria

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We conclude the issue of the sufficiency of the chain-of-custody evidence has been forfeited and the actual evidence presented in this case to have met the bare minimum standard for sufficiency enunciated in Woods.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Aquisto
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2022-02-24· cited 45×
• People v. Sorrels
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-04-20· cited 30×
• People v. Harris
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-06-18· cited 28×
• People v. Wilson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2017-12-18· cited 23×
• People v. Smith
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-09-25· cited 19×
• People v. Taylor
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-02-04· cited 8×
• People v. Jones
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2021-08-23· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Illgen
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1991-11-21· cited 710×
• People v. Donoho
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2003-04-03· cited 617×
• People v. Fern
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1999-11-18· cited 486×
• People v. Woods
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-04-07· cited 400×
• People v. Robinson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1995-10-26· cited 245×
• People v. Gibson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-04-14· cited 45×
• People v. Cowans
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-12-06· cited 43×
• People v. Irpino
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-03-22· cited 35×
• People v. Echavarria
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-05-25· cited 3×